Inaccuracies were made.
Substitution referee Bruce Hermansen acknowledged that immediately after the
game when he explained the Seahawks were not charged a timeout as they must
have been after receiver Doug Baldwin needed to be tended to right after he was
injured on the area with 42 seconds still left.
In fact, Hermansen introduced to the crowd that Seattle had
been charged a timeout following that play and had no timeouts remaining.
Footage of that has grown to be employed as proof -- a Zapruder film so to converse-- that shows not only did official make a mistake, but they lied about the nature of the blunder.
In influence, the true error wasn't that the officials failed to charged Seattle a timeout after Baldwin's injury, but the Seahawks ended up granted a timeout 12 seconds later when they called for a timeout they didn't ensure.
"What the officials are supposed to do if a player calls a timeout he doesn't have is just ignore him and keep the clock running. But the replacement officials working the Seahawks-Cardinals game apparently didn't know they were supposed to ignore the timeout, and that's a rule the NFL needs to make sure the officials know going forward."
Footage of that has grown to be employed as proof -- a Zapruder film so to converse-- that shows not only did official make a mistake, but they lied about the nature of the blunder.
In influence, the true error wasn't that the officials failed to charged Seattle a timeout after Baldwin's injury, but the Seahawks ended up granted a timeout 12 seconds later when they called for a timeout they didn't ensure.
"What the officials are supposed to do if a player calls a timeout he doesn't have is just ignore him and keep the clock running. But the replacement officials working the Seahawks-Cardinals game apparently didn't know they were supposed to ignore the timeout, and that's a rule the NFL needs to make sure the officials know going forward."
-- Michael David Smith
All this criticism ignores one particular truth, even though: Seattle mentor Pete Carroll said he was advised Seattle still had a timeout remaining following the play on which Baldwin was incapacitated.
"I was told we had a timeout, which we did," Carroll said. "We should have had a timeout there. I think they took one off for the injury so the timeout comes back to us. We made that very clear, and they said, 'OK, you have a timeout left.' That was why the back judge over here came running in to make sure, because he realized it, to ensure we had a timeout."
This is an important difference because in the assessment of the scenario,
the Seahawks have been presented as a lot of bumpkins hoping to call a timeout
they didn't have. Yet Carroll indicated -- quite clearly -- that he was advised
by an official that there was a timeout remaining, which is why he referred to
as that operate by Marshawn Lynch on first-and-goal from the six.All this criticism ignores one particular truth, even though: Seattle mentor Pete Carroll said he was advised Seattle still had a timeout remaining following the play on which Baldwin was incapacitated.
"I was told we had a timeout, which we did," Carroll said. "We should have had a timeout there. I think they took one off for the injury so the timeout comes back to us. We made that very clear, and they said, 'OK, you have a timeout left.' That was why the back judge over here came running in to make sure, because he realized it, to ensure we had a timeout."
Really should Carroll or someone on his staff have acknowledged the Seahawks ought to have been charged a timeout right after the injury to Baldwin? Possibly. But can you blame Seattle for calling a timeout that it was informed by an official that the staff did in simple fact still possess? Barely.
We have cheap Seahawks tickets obtainable for all games this upcoming season, which includes the pre-season games. We offer inexpensive Seattle Seahawksticket, 24/7 live customer service and more quickly turnaround than all the competitors. We specialize in very last minute Seattle Seahawks tickets.
